Logic the Anatomy of Thought.

antthecreator:

Logic drives one to a further level of understanding in all aspects of life. The human makes choices in matters of the heart and give in to believe that love over came them, love is a decision not an emotion. Logic in itself is the core of human experience and development. 

 ”Man has such a predilecation for systems and abstract deductions that he is ready to distort the truth intentionally, his is ready to deny the evidence of his sense only to justify his logic.”

-Fyodor Dostoyevsky

You tell em Ant!

"Science is a way of thinking much more than it is a body of knowledge"

Carl Sagan

Section about Pure O’s I found interesting since it seems like my same exact thought process except for the violence.

The accompanying diagram illustrates the endless cycle of spiking and ruminating. On the left-hand side of the diagram you will see references to “subconscious mental processes” and the “anxiety center.” The subconscious mental processes are located in the outer portion of the brain and represent parts of the brain that are creative and always on the lookout for pertinent information. Evidence of its existence lies in a phenomenon known as the “Tip-of-the-Tongue” effect (Brown & McNeil, 1966). All of us have had the experience of searching for a word or fact that is just on the tip of our tongue, but continues to elude us. So we give up trying to recall it and go about our business. Then, later, it pops into our consciousness, even though our mind is preoccupied with another topic. I believe that there is a non-conscious portion of the brain that searches our meaningful material and sends this information to one’s consciousness. One tends to more readily notice information that has a strong association component with significant material than non-relevant information. For example, when we see a red light, we immediately react to it as a warning (i.e., unconsciously, we associate a red light with the idea of a hazard). For the “Pure-O” sufferer plagued with thoughts of violence, the sight of a knife might spike the thought of stabbing a loved one. The “Anxiety Center” (left side of the diagram) is closely associated with the “Subconscious Mental Processes” (see diagram). This part of the brain is called the amygdala. Brain mapping studies suggest that the amygdala is active when we experience emotional upheaval. On occasion, the amygdala is triggered by an external stimulus, e.g., finding a snake in one’s camping tent. In the case of panic attacks, seemingly random events can trigger the amygdala to misfire and send the same types of signals. The Anxiety Center is responsible for the fight-or-flight response. Brain mapping studies suggest that the amygdala is the center of visceral awareness that there is an urgent threat demanding immediate attention. The Anxiety Center activates psychological responses to emotional information, such as, rapid heart rate, racing thoughts or upset stomach. The resource center transmits information to our conscious awareness that deems material relevant or significant. It is at this juncture that most “Pure-O‘s” becomes fixated and distraught.

The transmission of the information from these subconscious processes to our conscious awareness is a purely reflexive one and beyond our control. However, it is not beyond our influence. When the spike reaches our “conscious awareness”, we have a choice as to how to process the thought (represented by the two arrows in the attached diagram). The arrow pointing upward suggests that the person experiencing the stimulus chooses to believe that the spike thought represents or reflects something deep and meaningful about the person; e.g., “only a vicious, loathsome human being could possibly think of stabbing their loved one.” This is referred to as the “instinctive response” (IR) because it is inherent within each person to resist anything which feels so threatening. People with OCD are not less tolerant of these upsetting ideas, which most humans report are a natural part of their daily existence. It is just that people with OCD experience a “misfire” in the brain, which makes them “feel” as if the idea is problematic. Usually, an effort is made to seek reassurance and disqualify the legitimacy of these upsetting ideas and threatening experiences.

The instinctive responses naturally produce the strong desire to engage in resistance and relief seeking. This represents, as Albert Ellis (1987, 1991) has suggested, a dysfunctional emotional response. The tremendous effort one puts into escaping the unwanted thoughts or preventing their recurrence (e.g. hiding knives), in effect reinforces (e.g. strengthens the association) its importance to the non-conscious brain and thereby feeds the vicious cycle. This process is represented in the accompanying diagram by the arrow pointing from the top box back toward the anxiety center. Similar notions have been proposed by Wenzlaff, Wegner, & Roper (1988). These authors suggest that attempting to suppress thoughts has the effect of making them stronger. Recognizing that you are upset by a thought and then reacting with resistance places a mental marker on it and, therefore, increases the likelihood of the thought reoccurring. For the sufferer with “Pure-O,” the spike is a double barrel shot of anxiety. First, there is anxiety for having such an unpleasant or deviant thought. Then, the tremendous, uncontrollable repetitiousness of the thoughts makes the sufferer think he is losing his mind. The uncertainty regarding mental loss of control can be a very anxiety provoking experience.

If you relate to any of this form of behavior I suggest reading through as it is becoming very insightful for myself.

cwnl:

Section about Pure O’s I found interesting since it seems like my same exact thought process except for the violence.

The accompanying diagram illustrates the endless cycle of spiking and ruminating. On the left-hand side of the diagram you will see references to “subconscious mental processes” and the “anxiety center.” The subconscious mental processes are located in the outer portion of the brain and represent parts of the brain that are creative and always on the lookout for pertinent information. Evidence of its existence lies in a phenomenon known as the “Tip-of-the-Tongue” effect (Brown & McNeil, 1966). All of us have had the experience of searching for a word or fact that is just on the tip of our tongue, but continues to elude us. So we give up trying to recall it and go about our business. Then, later, it pops into our consciousness, even though our mind is preoccupied with another topic. I believe that there is a non-conscious portion of the brain that searches our meaningful material and sends this information to one’s consciousness. One tends to more readily notice information that has a strong association component with significant material than non-relevant information. For example, when we see a red light, we immediately react to it as a warning (i.e., unconsciously, we associate a red light with the idea of a hazard). For the “Pure-O” sufferer plagued with thoughts of violence, the sight of a knife might spike the thought of stabbing a loved one. The “Anxiety Center” (left side of the diagram) is closely associated with the “Subconscious Mental Processes” (see diagram). This part of the brain is called the amygdala. Brain mapping studies suggest that the amygdala is active when we experience emotional upheaval. On occasion, the amygdala is triggered by an external stimulus, e.g., finding a snake in one’s camping tent. In the case of panic attacks, seemingly random events can trigger the amygdala to misfire and send the same types of signals. The Anxiety Center is responsible for the fight-or-flight response. Brain mapping studies suggest that the amygdala is the center of visceral awareness that there is an urgent threat demanding immediate attention. The Anxiety Center activates psychological responses to emotional information, such as, rapid heart rate, racing thoughts or upset stomach. The resource center transmits information to our conscious awareness that deems material relevant or significant. It is at this juncture that most “Pure-O‘s” becomes fixated and distraught.

The transmission of the information from these subconscious processes to our conscious awareness is a purely reflexive one and beyond our control. However, it is not beyond our influence. When the spike reaches our “conscious awareness”, we have a choice as to how to process the thought (represented by the two arrows in the attached diagram). The arrow pointing upward suggests that the person experiencing the stimulus chooses to believe that the spike thought represents or reflects something deep and meaningful about the person; e.g., “only a vicious, loathsome human being could possibly think of stabbing their loved one.” This is referred to as the “instinctive response” (IR) because it is inherent within each person to resist anything which feels so threatening. People with OCD are not less tolerant of these upsetting ideas, which most humans report are a natural part of their daily existence. It is just that people with OCD experience a “misfire” in the brain, which makes them “feel” as if the idea is problematic. Usually, an effort is made to seek reassurance and disqualify the legitimacy of these upsetting ideas and threatening experiences.

The instinctive responses naturally produce the strong desire to engage in resistance and relief seeking. This represents, as Albert Ellis (1987, 1991) has suggested, a dysfunctional emotional response. The tremendous effort one puts into escaping the unwanted thoughts or preventing their recurrence (e.g. hiding knives), in effect reinforces (e.g. strengthens the association) its importance to the non-conscious brain and thereby feeds the vicious cycle. This process is represented in the accompanying diagram by the arrow pointing from the top box back toward the anxiety center. Similar notions have been proposed by Wenzlaff, Wegner, & Roper (1988). These authors suggest that attempting to suppress thoughts has the effect of making them stronger. Recognizing that you are upset by a thought and then reacting with resistance places a mental marker on it and, therefore, increases the likelihood of the thought reoccurring. For the sufferer with “Pure-O,” the spike is a double barrel shot of anxiety. First, there is anxiety for having such an unpleasant or deviant thought. Then, the tremendous, uncontrollable repetitiousness of the thoughts makes the sufferer think he is losing his mind. The uncertainty regarding mental loss of control can be a very anxiety provoking experience.

If you relate to any of this form of behavior I suggest reading through as it is becoming very insightful for myself.

Ever since reading this up, I’ve been able to control the OCD a lot better. It still happens, all the constant thinking which leads to more of it, but I’m able to filter them now. Between which are important and which aren’t. I still can’t believe I’ve lived all this time and never knew I had it. But it explains so much about my personality and way of thinking.

Section about Pure O’s I found interesting since it seems like my same exact thought process except for the violence.

The accompanying diagram illustrates the endless cycle of spiking and ruminating. On the left-hand side of the diagram you will see references to “subconscious mental processes” and the “anxiety center.” The subconscious mental processes are located in the outer portion of the brain and represent parts of the brain that are creative and always on the lookout for pertinent information. Evidence of its existence lies in a phenomenon known as the “Tip-of-the-Tongue” effect (Brown & McNeil, 1966). All of us have had the experience of searching for a word or fact that is just on the tip of our tongue, but continues to elude us. So we give up trying to recall it and go about our business. Then, later, it pops into our consciousness, even though our mind is preoccupied with another topic. I believe that there is a non-conscious portion of the brain that searches our meaningful material and sends this information to one’s consciousness. One tends to more readily notice information that has a strong association component with significant material than non-relevant information. For example, when we see a red light, we immediately react to it as a warning (i.e., unconsciously, we associate a red light with the idea of a hazard). For the “Pure-O” sufferer plagued with thoughts of violence, the sight of a knife might spike the thought of stabbing a loved one. The “Anxiety Center” (left side of the diagram) is closely associated with the “Subconscious Mental Processes” (see diagram). This part of the brain is called the amygdala. Brain mapping studies suggest that the amygdala is active when we experience emotional upheaval. On occasion, the amygdala is triggered by an external stimulus, e.g., finding a snake in one’s camping tent. In the case of panic attacks, seemingly random events can trigger the amygdala to misfire and send the same types of signals. The Anxiety Center is responsible for the fight-or-flight response. Brain mapping studies suggest that the amygdala is the center of visceral awareness that there is an urgent threat demanding immediate attention. The Anxiety Center activates psychological responses to emotional information, such as, rapid heart rate, racing thoughts or upset stomach. The resource center transmits information to our conscious awareness that deems material relevant or significant. It is at this juncture that most “Pure-O‘s” becomes fixated and distraught.

The transmission of the information from these subconscious processes to our conscious awareness is a purely reflexive one and beyond our control. However, it is not beyond our influence. When the spike reaches our “conscious awareness”, we have a choice as to how to process the thought (represented by the two arrows in the attached diagram). The arrow pointing upward suggests that the person experiencing the stimulus chooses to believe that the spike thought represents or reflects something deep and meaningful about the person; e.g., “only a vicious, loathsome human being could possibly think of stabbing their loved one.” This is referred to as the “instinctive response” (IR) because it is inherent within each person to resist anything which feels so threatening. People with OCD are not less tolerant of these upsetting ideas, which most humans report are a natural part of their daily existence. It is just that people with OCD experience a “misfire” in the brain, which makes them “feel” as if the idea is problematic. Usually, an effort is made to seek reassurance and disqualify the legitimacy of these upsetting ideas and threatening experiences.

The instinctive responses naturally produce the strong desire to engage in resistance and relief seeking. This represents, as Albert Ellis (1987, 1991) has suggested, a dysfunctional emotional response. The tremendous effort one puts into escaping the unwanted thoughts or preventing their recurrence (e.g. hiding knives), in effect reinforces (e.g. strengthens the association) its importance to the non-conscious brain and thereby feeds the vicious cycle. This process is represented in the accompanying diagram by the arrow pointing from the top box back toward the anxiety center. Similar notions have been proposed by Wenzlaff, Wegner, & Roper (1988). These authors suggest that attempting to suppress thoughts has the effect of making them stronger. Recognizing that you are upset by a thought and then reacting with resistance places a mental marker on it and, therefore, increases the likelihood of the thought reoccurring. For the sufferer with “Pure-O,” the spike is a double barrel shot of anxiety. First, there is anxiety for having such an unpleasant or deviant thought. Then, the tremendous, uncontrollable repetitiousness of the thoughts makes the sufferer think he is losing his mind. The uncertainty regarding mental loss of control can be a very anxiety provoking experience.

If you relate to any of this form of behavior I suggest reading through as it is becoming very insightful for myself.

A thought on the word ‘Hipster’

I think of it, I see some posts on how dads had the “hipster” look since before you. But then I realized, doesn’t that mean that the culture or say that sort of fashion or just plain interest in that kind of clothing isn’t really hipster but just what their past culture passed on to them? And then it makes more sense to me because in the very judgmental world this has turned into where everyone has an opinion on something, even dressing casual is called hipster. Anything slightly out of the norm is called hipster. This happens with everything. People say it’s because they do it to be [insert label here], and I don’t know maybe I’m crazy but what if they’re actually doing it because it is the style that calls out and or relates to them most and has little to do with what image they are trying to portray for you. This rationale can be applied to just about every labeling ever. See it’s a lot easier to make fun of someone or generalize someone you know little of by constraining it all into one word so you can make your insults a bit more organized. The sick obsession people have with themselves as opposed to what is around them, gives them this notion that other’s action are done so that they can comment on it or so that they can get attention. While yes, there are people who portray an image for the sake of that image, this happens within every culture, does not mean that there is an entire group that consists of only that. Instead, I would see it as people who can compare with one another same way I’m sure you can find similarities with a gay person and realize you are much alike but for the simple fact that you are straight and the person is gay. Doesn’t make them any different and it doesn’t make them any more worthy of being grouped and judged than you are. It’s a bit twisted I gotto admit. And a very nasty look into the reality of who most people are or should I say, who they aren’t. Our societies become more and more into segregation, separation and continuance of history with the way we not only separate ourselves but separate ourselves from our own species and they don’t even realize it.

Good ol labels, they’re gonna be the death of us and our self-indulgence.

My peers:

You’re all so quick to point at who the bad guy is, who is doing your country wrong, who are the driving forces turning our economy into shit, our Earth into a dried up rock, Fresh air now hot-air both figuratively and literally speaking. People and groups labeled to the point where they are harmed, mistreated, robbed of the equal rights.

Why don’t you ever do anything about it? I wish there were more of you who saw things the way I did, the hope I have in us to do better than this. If I saw that I wasn’t the only one who wanted to do more than just post influential pictures I would have joined this movement to save Earth from stupidity, immorality, idiocy, governmental oppression and more I would have joined said movement eons ago.

I’m working on an essay, with cited information and facts, evidence and sources all dealing with what I think is wrong on Earth now, here, today, and what we can all do about it to slowly crawl out of the heavy burden left on us by previous generations and bad policies. We’re no longer at an age of complaint, the only reason nothing has happened is because relative to the amount of people here on Earth, the millions and billions of people suffering we’ve yet to make that big movement. We’re no longer at an age where religion thrives over science, where we think the earth is flat, or that it’s stationed and the cosmos revolves around us.

From all the culminated information we now have, the mistakes we’ve made, we know we are here alone. There’s no one to watch over us as we wrong each other, the best way to get out of all this is to embrace this fact, that we only have Earth, and ourselves, our neighbors and we must act now not later, to build the bridges that shape a better tomorrow. So that future generations aren’t poised with our problems, they don’t deserve it and neither did we.

If it’s true that comets, asteroids, colliding planets and other cosmic bodies

Spread water, large bodies of land, essential chemical elements for energy, and other processes we now have here on earth.

Then would it not make sense that life is also spread this way too? Out of the chaos, comes art and beauty.

Mind Control Device to Reign at CES

Touchscreens? So two years ago. Gesture recognition? How 2010. Everyone knows the future lies in thought-controlled interfaces.

At least that’s what InteraXon, a tiny Toronto startup, is hoping to convince attendees of at this year’s Consumer Electronics Show. The company, which made waves at the 2010 winter Olympics by allowing users in Vancouver to control the lights on the CN Tower in Toronto with mere thought, will be showing off two new applications for its mind-control technology at the upcoming Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vegas.

Mind Control Device to Reign at CES

Touchscreens? So two years ago. Gesture recognition? How 2010. Everyone knows the future lies in thought-controlled interfaces.

At least that’s what InteraXon, a tiny Toronto startup, is hoping to convince attendees of at this year’s Consumer Electronics Show. The company, which made waves at the 2010 winter Olympics by allowing users in Vancouver to control the lights on the CN Tower in Toronto with mere thought, will be showing off two new applications for its mind-control technology at the upcoming Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vegas.

Highdea:

It mindfucks me a little knowing Red Planet Mars once had thriving oceans more than 3 billions years ago, meaning there was a high probability of there being life, maybe not as complex but still what we would consider to be alive. At this point you’re thinking “How is it a mindfuck?” Well, think of this: Human civilization when you look at it on a cosmic scale came about shortly after the Dinosaurs became extinct in what most scientists agree a huge “meteor” hitting earth billions of years ago caused the instant extinction of thousands of species.

Now think of panspermia, which is as noted in previous articles “proposes that life that can survive the effects of space, such as extremophile bacteria, become trapped in debris that’s ejected into space after collisions between planets that harbor life and Small Solar System Bodies (SSSB). Bacteria may travel dormant for an extended amount of time before colliding randomly with other planets or intermingling with protoplanetary discs. If met with ideal conditions on the new planets’ surfaces, the bacteria become active and the process of evolution begins.”

Now with that in mind, isn’t it a little odd that around the time Mars lost its oceans, the dinosaurs became extinct and Earth to some extent, was reset? Idk, I guess I like toying with the idea that something else hit Earth billions of years ago. And that Mars was not always a desert planet, but more similar to Earth than we think. If you give it some thought, it’s not really that farfetched to think Mars once had life similar to our own (maybe not the exact same but close).

In addition, a big chunk of land mass was removed millions of years ago from mars during a collision when Earth wasn’t even harboring life.

Scientist only have the data that proves there were oceans once, and what period of time they vanished. But there’s no data showing when they got there and for how long did the oceans thrive. So I think the jury is out on any evolutionary processes that might have taken place there.

With nothing telling us when it started, we have no real say on how long there was life there.

But on a related note, even if there was life close to something as simple as an amoeba I’d still be shitting bricks.

Highdea:

It mindfucks me a little knowing Red Planet Mars once had thriving oceans more than 3 billions years ago, meaning there was a high probability of there being life, maybe not as complex but still what we would consider to be alive. At this point you’re thinking “How is it a mindfuck?” Well, think of this: Human civilization when you look at it on a cosmic scale came about shortly after the Dinosaurs became extinct in what most scientists agree a huge “meteor” hitting earth billions of years ago caused the instant extinction of thousands of species.

Now think of panspermia, which is as noted in previous articles “proposes that life that can survive the effects of space, such as extremophile bacteria, become trapped in debris that’s ejected into space after collisions between planets that harbor life and Small Solar System Bodies (SSSB). Bacteria may travel dormant for an extended amount of time before colliding randomly with other planets or intermingling with protoplanetary discs. If met with ideal conditions on the new planets’ surfaces, the bacteria become active and the process of evolution begins.”

Now with that in mind, isn’t it a little odd that around the time Mars lost its oceans, the dinosaurs became extinct and Earth to some extent, was reset? Idk, I guess I like toying with the idea that something else hit Earth billions of years ago. And that Mars was not always a desert planet, but more similar to Earth than we think. If you give it some thought, it’s not really that farfetched to think Mars once had life similar to our own (maybe not the exact same but close).

In addition, a big chunk of land mass was removed millions of years ago from mars during a collision when Earth wasn’t even harboring life.

Scientist only have the data that proves there were oceans once, and what period of time they vanished. But there’s no data showing when they got there and for how long did the oceans thrive. So I think the jury is out on any evolutionary processes that might have taken place there.

With nothing telling us when it started, we have no real say on how long there was life there.

But on a related note, even if there was life close to something as simple as an amoeba I’d still be shitting bricks.