Are We Living Inside a Computer Simulation?

The popular film trilogy, The Matrix, presented a cyberuniverse where humans live in a simulated reality created by sentient machines.

Now, a philosopher and team of physicists imagine that we might really be living inside a computer-generated universe that you could call The Lattice. What’s more, we may be able to detect it.

In 2003, British philosopher Nick Bostrom published a paper that proposed the universe we live in might in fact really be a numerical computer simulation. To give this a bizarre Twilight Zone twist, he suggested that our far-evolved distant descendants might construct such a program to simulate the past and recreate how their remote ancestors lived.

He felt that such an experiment was inevitable for a supercivilization. If it didn’t happen by now, then in meant that humanity never evolved that far and we’re doomed to a short lifespan as a species, he argued.

To extrapolate further, I’d suggest that artificial intelligent entities descended from us would be curious about looking back in time by simulating the universe of their biological ancestors.

As off-the-wall as this sounds, a team of physicists at the University of Washington (UW) recently announced that there is a potential test to seen if we actually live in The Lattice. Ironically, it would be the first such observation for scientifically hypothesized evidence of intelligent design behind the cosmos.

The UW team too propose that super-intelligent entities, bored with their current universe, do numerical simulations to explore all possibilities in the landscape of the underlying quantum vacuum (from which the big bang percolated) through universe simulations. “This is perhaps the most profound quest that can be undertaken by a sentient being,” write the authors.

Before you dismiss this idea as completely loony, the reality of such a Sim Universe might solve a lot of eerie mysteries about the cosmos. About two-dozen of the universe’s fundamental constants happen to fall within the narrow range thought to be compatible with life. At first glance it seems as unlikely as balancing a pencil on its tip. Jiggle these parameters and life as we know it would have never appeared. Not even stars and galaxies. This is called the Anthropic principle.

ANALYSIS: Building the Universe Inside a Supercomputer

The discovery of dark energy over a decade ago further compounds the universe’s strangeness. This sort of “antigravity” pushing space-time apart is the closest thing there is to nothing and still is something. This energy from the vacuum of space is 60 orders of magnitude weaker that what would be predicted by quantum physics.The eminent cosmologist Michael Turner ranks dark energy as “the most profound mystery in all of science.”

We are also living at a very special time in the universe’s history where it switched gears from decelerating to accelerating under the push of dark energy. This begs the question “why me why now?” (A phrase popularly attributed to Olympic figure skater Nancy Kerrigan in 1994 when she was attacked and crippled by an opponent.)

If dark energy were slightly stronger the universe would have blown apart before stars formed. Any weaker and the universe would have imploded long ago. Its incredibly anemic value has been seen as circumstantial evidence for parallel universes with their own flavor of dark energy that is typically destructive. It’s as if our universe won the lottery and got all the physical parameters just right for us to exist.

Finally, an artificial universe solves the Fermi Paradox (where are all the space aliens?) by implying that we truly are alone in the universe. It was custom made for us by our far-future progeny.

Biblical creationists can no doubt embrace these seeming cosmic coincidences as unequivocal evidence for their “theory” of Intelligent Design (ID). But is our “God” really a computer programmer rather than a bearded old man living in the sky?

Currently, supercomputers using a impressive-sounding technique called lattice quantum chromodynamics, and starting from the fundamental physical laws, can simulate only a very small portion of the universe. The scale is a little larger than the nucleus of an atom, according UW physicist Martin Savage. Mega-computers of the far future could greatly expand the size of the Sim Universe.

ANALYSIS: Artificial Universe Created Inside a Supercomputer

If we are living in such a program, there could be telltale evidence for the underlying lattice used in modeling the space-time continuum, say the researchers. This signature could show up as a limitation in the energy of cosmic rays. They would travel diagonally across the model universe and not interact equally in all directions, as they otherwise would be expected to do according to present cosmology.

If such results were measured, physicists would have to rule out any and all other natural explanations for the anomaly before flirting with the idea of intelligent design. (To avoid confusion with the purely faith-based creationist ID, this would not prove the existence of a biblical God, because you’d have to ask the question “why does God need a lattice?”)

If our universe is a simulation, then those entities controlling it could be running other simulations as well to create other universes parallel to our own. No doubt this would call for, ahem, massive parallel processing.

If all of this isn’t mind-blowing enough, Bostrom imagined “stacked” levels of reality, “we would have to suspect that the post-humans running our simulation are themselves simulated beings; and their creators, in turn, may also be simulated beings. Here may be room for a large number of levels of reality, and the number could be increasing over time.”

To compound this even further, Bostrom imagined a hierarchy of deities, “In some ways, the post-humans running a simulation are like gods. However, all the demigods except those at the fundamental level of reality are subject to sanctions by the more powerful gods living at lower levels.”

If the parallel universes are all running on the same computer platform could we communicate with them? If so, I hope the Matrix’s manic Agent Smith doesn’t materialize one day.

To borrow from the title of Isaac Asimov’s novel I Robot, the human condition might be described as I Subroutine.

davidreese:

Artist/programmer/designer Marcin Ignac used software to track, measure, and visualize his computer use every day for 2.5 years. The result: This beautiful, simple look at one of the most prominent aspects of daily life in the 21st century. Each line is a single day, with colors representing which app was being used at the time of day. (So, for example, your line might be red during this time, signaling that you’re using your browser.) The black sections are times when he had his computer off—meaning that blacked-out section in every day is probably night.

davidreese:

Artist/programmer/designer Marcin Ignac used software to track, measure, and visualize his computer use every day for 2.5 years. The result: This beautiful, simple look at one of the most prominent aspects of daily life in the 21st century. Each line is a single day, with colors representing which app was being used at the time of day. (So, for example, your line might be red during this time, signaling that you’re using your browser.) The black sections are times when he had his computer off—meaning that blacked-out section in every day is probably night.


  Universe Grows Like a Giant Brain
  
  The universe may grow like a giant brain, according to a new computer simulation.
  
  Image: A fundamental law of nature may govern the growth of brain networks, social networks, and the expansion of the Universe, a new computer simulation suggests Credit: WGBH Educational Foundation
  
  The results, published Nov.16 in the journal Nature’s Scientific Reports, suggest that some undiscovered, fundamental laws may govern the growth of systems large and small, from the electrical firing between brain cells and growth of social networks to the expansion of galaxies.
  
  “Natural growth dynamics are the same for different real networks, like the Internet or the brain or social networks,” said study co-author Dmitri Krioukov, a physicist at the University of California San Diego.
  
  The new study suggests a single fundamental law of nature may govern these networks, said physicist Kevin Bassler of the University of Houston, who was not involved in the study.
  
  “At first blush they seem to be quite different systems, the question is, is there some kind of controlling laws can describe them?”.
  
  By raising this question, “their work really makes a pretty important contribution,” he said.
  
  Similar Networks
  
  Past studies showed brain circuits and the Internet look a lot alike. But despite finding this functional similarity, nobody had developed equations to perfectly predict how computer networks, brain circuits or social networks grow over time, Krioukov said.
  
  Using Einstein’s equations of relativity, which explain how matter warps the fabric of space-time, physicists can retrace the universe’s explosive birth in the Big Bang roughly 14 billion years ago and how it has expanded outward in the eons since.
  
  So Krioukov’s team wondered whether the universe’s accelerating growth could provide insight into the ways social networks or brain circuits expand.
  
  Brain cells and galaxies
  
  The team created a computer simulation that broke the early universe into the tiniest possible units — quanta of space-time more miniscule than subatomic particles. The simulation linked any quanta, or nodes in a massive celestial network, that were causally related. (Nothing travels faster than light, so if a person hits a baseball on Earth, the ripple effects of that event could never reach an alien in a distant galaxy in a reasonable amount of time, meaning those two regions of space-time aren’t causally related.)
  
  As the simulation progressed, it added more and more space-time to the history of the universe, and so its “network” connections between matter in galaxies, grew as well, Krioukov said.
  
  When the team compared the universe’s history with growth of social networks and brain circuits, they found all the networks expanded in similar ways: They balanced links between similar nodes with ones that already had many connections. For instance, a cat lover surfing the Internet may visit mega-sites such as Google or Yahoo, but will also browse cat fancier websites or YouTube kitten videos. In the same way, neighboring brain cells like to connect, but neurons also link to such “Google brain cells” that are hooked up to loads of other brain cells.
  
  The eerie similarity between networks large and small is unlikely to be a coincidence, Krioukov said.
  
  “For a physicist it’s an immediate signal that there is some missing understanding of how nature works,” Krioukov said.
  
  It’s more likely that some unknown law governs the way networks grow and change, from the smallest brain cells to the growth of mega-galaxies, Krioukov said.
  
  “This result suggests that maybe we should start looking for it,” Krioukov told LiveScience.

Universe Grows Like a Giant Brain

The universe may grow like a giant brain, according to a new computer simulation.

Image: A fundamental law of nature may govern the growth of brain networks, social networks, and the expansion of the Universe, a new computer simulation suggests Credit: WGBH Educational Foundation

The results, published Nov.16 in the journal Nature’s Scientific Reports, suggest that some undiscovered, fundamental laws may govern the growth of systems large and small, from the electrical firing between brain cells and growth of social networks to the expansion of galaxies.

“Natural growth dynamics are the same for different real networks, like the Internet or the brain or social networks,” said study co-author Dmitri Krioukov, a physicist at the University of California San Diego.

The new study suggests a single fundamental law of nature may govern these networks, said physicist Kevin Bassler of the University of Houston, who was not involved in the study.

“At first blush they seem to be quite different systems, the question is, is there some kind of controlling laws can describe them?”.

By raising this question, “their work really makes a pretty important contribution,” he said.

Similar Networks

Past studies showed brain circuits and the Internet look a lot alike. But despite finding this functional similarity, nobody had developed equations to perfectly predict how computer networks, brain circuits or social networks grow over time, Krioukov said.

Using Einstein’s equations of relativity, which explain how matter warps the fabric of space-time, physicists can retrace the universe’s explosive birth in the Big Bang roughly 14 billion years ago and how it has expanded outward in the eons since.

So Krioukov’s team wondered whether the universe’s accelerating growth could provide insight into the ways social networks or brain circuits expand.

Brain cells and galaxies

The team created a computer simulation that broke the early universe into the tiniest possible units — quanta of space-time more miniscule than subatomic particles. The simulation linked any quanta, or nodes in a massive celestial network, that were causally related. (Nothing travels faster than light, so if a person hits a baseball on Earth, the ripple effects of that event could never reach an alien in a distant galaxy in a reasonable amount of time, meaning those two regions of space-time aren’t causally related.)

As the simulation progressed, it added more and more space-time to the history of the universe, and so its “network” connections between matter in galaxies, grew as well, Krioukov said.

When the team compared the universe’s history with growth of social networks and brain circuits, they found all the networks expanded in similar ways: They balanced links between similar nodes with ones that already had many connections. For instance, a cat lover surfing the Internet may visit mega-sites such as Google or Yahoo, but will also browse cat fancier websites or YouTube kitten videos. In the same way, neighboring brain cells like to connect, but neurons also link to such “Google brain cells” that are hooked up to loads of other brain cells.

The eerie similarity between networks large and small is unlikely to be a coincidence, Krioukov said.

“For a physicist it’s an immediate signal that there is some missing understanding of how nature works,” Krioukov said.

It’s more likely that some unknown law governs the way networks grow and change, from the smallest brain cells to the growth of mega-galaxies, Krioukov said.

“This result suggests that maybe we should start looking for it,” Krioukov told LiveScience.

John McCarthy — The Father of Artificial Intelligence

John McCarthy (September 4, 1927 – October 24, 2011) was an American computer scientist and cognitive scientist.

He invented the term “artificial intelligence” (AI), developed the Lisp programming language family, significantly influenced the design of the ALGOL programming language, popularized timesharing (the sharing of a computing resource among many users by means of multiprogramming and multi-tasking), and was very influential in the early development of AI.

McCarthy received many accolades and honors, such as the Turing Award for his contributions to the topic of AI, the United States National Medal of Science, and the Kyoto Prize.

John McCarthy — The Father of Artificial Intelligence

John McCarthy (September 4, 1927 – October 24, 2011) was an American computer scientist and cognitive scientist.

He invented the term “artificial intelligence” (AI), developed the Lisp programming language family, significantly influenced the design of the ALGOL programming language, popularized timesharing (the sharing of a computing resource among many users by means of multiprogramming and multi-tasking), and was very influential in the early development of AI.

McCarthy received many accolades and honors, such as the Turing Award for his contributions to the topic of AI, the United States National Medal of Science, and the Kyoto Prize.

Artificial Universe Similar to Ours Built with Supercomputer

Building a universe from scratch that brims with galaxies resembling those around us is now possible on supercomputers for the first time, researchers say.

Our galaxy, the Milky Way, is a spiral galaxy with a broad disk and outstretched arms, as are many in our cosmic neighborhood, such as Andromeda, the Pinwheel and the Whirlpool galaxies. Spiral galaxies are common, but past computer models that aimed to accurately simulate the birth and evolution of the universe over billions of years had trouble creating them. Instead, they often generated lots of blobby galaxies clumped into balls.

New computer simulations can now recreate the kind of galactic communities seen in our universe, starting with the observed afterglow of the Big Bang and evolving forward in time. Harvard’s Odyssey supercomputer allowed simulations that compressed nearly 14 billion years into only a few months.

“We’ve created the full variety of galaxies we see in the local universe,” said study author Mark Vogelsberger at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.

Artificial Universe Similar to Ours Built with Supercomputer

Building a universe from scratch that brims with galaxies resembling those around us is now possible on supercomputers for the first time, researchers say.

Our galaxy, the Milky Way, is a spiral galaxy with a broad disk and outstretched arms, as are many in our cosmic neighborhood, such as Andromeda, the Pinwheel and the Whirlpool galaxies. Spiral galaxies are common, but past computer models that aimed to accurately simulate the birth and evolution of the universe over billions of years had trouble creating them. Instead, they often generated lots of blobby galaxies clumped into balls.

New computer simulations can now recreate the kind of galactic communities seen in our universe, starting with the observed afterglow of the Big Bang and evolving forward in time. Harvard’s Odyssey supercomputer allowed simulations that compressed nearly 14 billion years into only a few months.

“We’ve created the full variety of galaxies we see in the local universe,” said study author Mark Vogelsberger at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.

laboratoryequipment:

Allowing Errors Makes Chip More Powerful, EfficientResearchers have unveiled an “inexact” computer chip that challenges the industry’s 50-year pursuit of accuracy. The design improves power and resource efficiency by allowing for occasional errors. Prototypes unveiled this week at the ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers in Cagliari, Italy, are at least 15 times more efficient than today’s technology.The research, which earned best-paper honors at the conference, was conducted by experts from Rice Univ., Singapore’s Nanyang Technological Univ. (NTU), Switzerland’s Center for Electronics and Microtechnology (CSEM) and the Univ. of California, Berkeley.Read more: http://www.laboratoryequipment.com/news-Allowing-Errors-Makes-Chip-More-Powerful-Efficient-051712.aspx

laboratoryequipment:

Allowing Errors Makes Chip More Powerful, Efficient

Researchers have unveiled an “inexact” computer chip that challenges the industry’s 50-year pursuit of accuracy. The design improves power and resource efficiency by allowing for occasional errors. Prototypes unveiled this week at the ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers in Cagliari, Italy, are at least 15 times more efficient than today’s technology.

The research, which earned best-paper honors at the conference, was conducted by experts from Rice Univ., Singapore’s Nanyang Technological Univ. (NTU), Switzerland’s Center for Electronics and Microtechnology (CSEM) and the Univ. of California, Berkeley.

Read more: http://www.laboratoryequipment.com/news-Allowing-Errors-Makes-Chip-More-Powerful-Efficient-051712.aspx


  Data as Art: 10 Striking Science Maps
  
  The computer age triggered a seemingly endless stream of scientific data, but such incoming mountains of information come at a cost. The more data you amass, the tougher it is to comprehend what you’re dealing with.
  
  In a push for better perspective, a group of information scientists in 2005 created a decade-long competitive art exhibit called Places & Spaces: Mapping Science. From artistic pop-culture plots to illustrations of the state of scientific collaboration (above), the founders hope winning entries inspire researchers to present their troves of data in clever and digestible ways.
  
  “Good science maps give you a holistic understanding of how the data is structured,” said information scientist Katy Börner of Indiana University, a founder and curator of the exhibit. She is also author of the Atlas of Science, a collection of the maps gathered over the years. “You don’t just have to use maps to find your way home. They can be ways to get global overviews on topics.”

Data as Art: 10 Striking Science Maps

The computer age triggered a seemingly endless stream of scientific data, but such incoming mountains of information come at a cost. The more data you amass, the tougher it is to comprehend what you’re dealing with.

In a push for better perspective, a group of information scientists in 2005 created a decade-long competitive art exhibit called Places & Spaces: Mapping Science. From artistic pop-culture plots to illustrations of the state of scientific collaboration (above), the founders hope winning entries inspire researchers to present their troves of data in clever and digestible ways.

“Good science maps give you a holistic understanding of how the data is structured,” said information scientist Katy Börner of Indiana University, a founder and curator of the exhibit. She is also author of the Atlas of Science, a collection of the maps gathered over the years. “You don’t just have to use maps to find your way home. They can be ways to get global overviews on topics.”

realcleverscience:

An excellent little article highlighting a growing trend: Computers replacing and augmenting the capabilities of doctors - especially in non-traditional circumstances. (For instance, I wrote the other day (here) about a webcam and “smart mirror” capable of diagnosing heart conditions, and just yesterday (here) about an iPhone app that allows doctors to diagnose a stroke on the go.)

Both of these are tremendous leaps and indicate where we’re going - though I bet (along with Dr. Mazoue, quoted in the article) that the majority of medical help in the near future will be done solely by computers, leaving doctors for the rare and unique situations. Many standard hospital procedures were once mocked for the notion of being able to mechanize medicine. Yet we have. And as we continue to learn how to do so, we’ll continue to enable our computers to perform just such tasks. And while this may be bad news for those entering the medical field, it’s great news for people’s health in general.

p.s. Thanks to smarterplanet for the link.

RCS Highlights:

If you show people’s faces to a computer, it does better than doctors at recognizing the signs of a rare hormone disorder, researchers report in a new study. By analyzing photos of individual faces, the computer system correctly identified 7 of every 10 people in the study with acromegaly.. Human experts.. roughly 6 out of 10 times.

“I have to say I was surprised,” Dr. Harald Schneider.. “We expected the program (at best to) achieve similar results as the experts but not to outperform them.”

The computer out-performed physicians in identifying both those who had acromegaly and those who did not… Schneider said he was especially encouraged by the computer’s ability to detect mild cases of acromegaly. In those cases the software was correct nearly 6 out of 10 times, but humans were accurate only 4 of 10 times…

“I see this one as yet another piece of evidence adding to the growing body of research that computer-based systems can diagnose patients as well as or better than human diagnosticians,” said Dr. James Mazoue... “We need to divorce ourselves from these legacy practices that are based on human intuition. I really don’t have any doubt that in the future that’s where things are moving,” Mazoue told Reuters Health…

[However,] The computer incorrectly diagnosed acromegaly in nearly nine percent of people who did not have the disease. [And the humans?]… Miller said he would like to see a program that could correctly identify people who don’t have acromegaly 99.9 percent of the time before it’s used in practice. But he called the system “a promising young technology.”

From Neurons to Conductors: The Computer Brain

Neuroscientists frequently compare the brain to an extremely super computer. Down to the Neuron’s which in a computer would be the Conductors or Memristors that carry out bits of information throughout a motherboard much like neurons carry bits of information throughout the brain. Since a computer is simpler than a brain we can look to the computer to get a simple story to how our brain works and reacts to certain things. The software being our genetic code which tells us what to do, who to be, how to be. The software is joined by a bigger network which is the mind, the OS, the Windows 7. Notice how in computers, all it takes is a well written code for one to crash a piece of the hardware which is what hackers have been doing since Windows was DOS. The same can be applied to our brain, one screw up in the genetic makeup and unfortunately someone ends up with a third arm too much. This is one of the main reasons why once you see the mind for what it is, you gain this sort of mind control on your own self. Because you understand your computer, your brain.

Text: Cwl

Image: HowStuffWorks

From Neurons to Conductors: The Computer Brain

Neuroscientists frequently compare the brain to an extremely super computer. Down to the Neuron’s which in a computer would be the Conductors or Memristors that carry out bits of information throughout a motherboard much like neurons carry bits of information throughout the brain. Since a computer is simpler than a brain we can look to the computer to get a simple story to how our brain works and reacts to certain things. The software being our genetic code which tells us what to do, who to be, how to be. The software is joined by a bigger network which is the mind, the OS, the Windows 7. Notice how in computers, all it takes is a well written code for one to crash a piece of the hardware which is what hackers have been doing since Windows was DOS. The same can be applied to our brain, one screw up in the genetic makeup and unfortunately someone ends up with a third arm too much. This is one of the main reasons why once you see the mind for what it is, you gain this sort of mind control on your own self. Because you understand your computer, your brain.

Text: Cwl

Image: HowStuffWorks

From Neurons to Conductors: The Computer Brain

Neuroscientists frequently compare the brain to an extremely super computer. Down to the Neuron’s which in a computer would be the Conductors or Memristors that carry out bits of information throughout a motherboard much like neurons carry bits of information throughout the brain. Since a computer is simpler than a brain we can look to the computer to get a simple story to how our brain works and reacts to certain things. The software being our genetic code which tells us what to do, who to be, how to be. The software is joined by a bigger network which is the mind, the OS, the Windows 7. Notice how in computers, all it takes is a well written code for one to crash a piece of the hardware which is what hackers have been doing since Windows was DOS. The same can be applied to our brain, one screw up in the genetic makeup and unfortunately someone ends up with a third arm too much. This is one of the main reasons why once you see the mind for what it is, you gain this sort of mind control on your own self. Because you understand your computer, your brain.

Text: Cwl

Image: HowStuffWorks

From Neurons to Conductors: The Computer Brain

Neuroscientists frequently compare the brain to an extremely super computer. Down to the Neuron’s which in a computer would be the Conductors or Memristors that carry out bits of information throughout a motherboard much like neurons carry bits of information throughout the brain. Since a computer is simpler than a brain we can look to the computer to get a simple story to how our brain works and reacts to certain things. The software being our genetic code which tells us what to do, who to be, how to be. The software is joined by a bigger network which is the mind, the OS, the Windows 7. Notice how in computers, all it takes is a well written code for one to crash a piece of the hardware which is what hackers have been doing since Windows was DOS. The same can be applied to our brain, one screw up in the genetic makeup and unfortunately someone ends up with a third arm too much. This is one of the main reasons why once you see the mind for what it is, you gain this sort of mind control on your own self. Because you understand your computer, your brain.

Text: Cwl

Image: HowStuffWorks

Data as Art: 10 Striking Science Maps

The computer age triggered a seemingly endless stream of scientific data, but such incoming mountains of information come at a cost. The more data you amass, the tougher it is to comprehend what you’re dealing with.

In a push for better perspective, a group of information scientists in 2005 created a decade-long competitive art exhibit called Places & Spaces: Mapping Science. From artistic pop-culture plots to illustrations of the state of scientific collaboration (above), the founders hope winning entries inspire researchers to present their troves of data in clever and digestible ways.

“Good science maps give you a holistic understanding of how the data is structured,” said information scientist Katy Börner of Indiana University, a founder and curator of the exhibit. She is also author of the Atlas of Science, a collection of the maps gathered over the years. “You don’t just have to use maps to find your way home. They can be ways to get global overviews on topics.”

Data as Art: 10 Striking Science Maps

The computer age triggered a seemingly endless stream of scientific data, but such incoming mountains of information come at a cost. The more data you amass, the tougher it is to comprehend what you’re dealing with.

In a push for better perspective, a group of information scientists in 2005 created a decade-long competitive art exhibit called Places & Spaces: Mapping Science. From artistic pop-culture plots to illustrations of the state of scientific collaboration (above), the founders hope winning entries inspire researchers to present their troves of data in clever and digestible ways.

“Good science maps give you a holistic understanding of how the data is structured,” said information scientist Katy Börner of Indiana University, a founder and curator of the exhibit. She is also author of the Atlas of Science, a collection of the maps gathered over the years. “You don’t just have to use maps to find your way home. They can be ways to get global overviews on topics.”

"Oh won’t you find it in your hard drive to please forgive me?” - File. Not. Found."

Futurama

cosmosweednlife:

How much information can the world transmit, process, and store? Estimating this sort of thing can be a nightmare, but the task can provide valuable information on trends that are changing our computing and broadcast infrastructure. So a pair of researchers have taken the job upon themselves and tracked the changes in 60 different analog and digital technologies, from newsprint to cellular data, for a period of over 20 years.

The trends they spot range from the expected—Internet access has pushed both analog and digital phones into a tiny niche—to the surprising, such as the fact that, in aggregate, gaming hardware has always had more computing power than the world’s supercomputers.

The authors were remarkably thorough. For storage media, they considered things like paper, film, and vinyl records, and such modern innovations as Blu-ray discs and memory cards. To standardize their measurements across media, they used Shannon’s information theory to consider data storage in terms of optimally compressed bits. They also tracked technology, noting that in the year 2000, bits of video were compressed using cinepak, which was far less efficient than the current MPEG-4 format; calculations were adjusted accordingly.

Even so, there are some significant estimations here. “For example,” the authors note, “after normalization on optimally compressed bits we can say things like ‘a 6 square-cm newspaper image is worth a 1,000 words.’”


  Data as Art: 10 Striking Science Maps
  
  The computer age triggered a seemingly endless stream of scientific data, but such incoming mountains of information come at a cost. The more data you amass, the tougher it is to comprehend what you’re dealing with.
  
  In a push for better perspective, a group of information scientists in 2005 created a decade-long competitive art exhibit called Places & Spaces: Mapping Science. From artistic pop-culture plots to illustrations of the state of scientific collaboration (above), the founders hope winning entries inspire researchers to present their troves of data in clever and digestible ways.
  
  “Good science maps give you a holistic understanding of how the data is structured,” said information scientist Katy Börner of Indiana University, a founder and curator of the exhibit. She is also author of the Atlas of Science, a collection of the maps gathered over the years. “You don’t just have to use maps to find your way home. They can be ways to get global overviews on topics.”

Data as Art: 10 Striking Science Maps

The computer age triggered a seemingly endless stream of scientific data, but such incoming mountains of information come at a cost. The more data you amass, the tougher it is to comprehend what you’re dealing with.

In a push for better perspective, a group of information scientists in 2005 created a decade-long competitive art exhibit called Places & Spaces: Mapping Science. From artistic pop-culture plots to illustrations of the state of scientific collaboration (above), the founders hope winning entries inspire researchers to present their troves of data in clever and digestible ways.

“Good science maps give you a holistic understanding of how the data is structured,” said information scientist Katy Börner of Indiana University, a founder and curator of the exhibit. She is also author of the Atlas of Science, a collection of the maps gathered over the years. “You don’t just have to use maps to find your way home. They can be ways to get global overviews on topics.”