Common Physics Misconceptions
Isn’t it time that we stop teaching our kids that the Earth is flat? Sure, we can’t exactly jump into special relativity in 8th grade science classes, but surely we can bring physics education into the 20th, or maybe 21st century?
A fine message by Henry from minutephysics, to go along with his open letter to the President on physics education.

It’s difficult not to think of an egg when looking at Saturn’s moon Methone, seen here during a Cassini flyby of the small moon. The relatively smooth surface adds to the effect created by the oblong shape.
Small moons like Methone are not generally spherical in shape like the larger moons. Their small sizes means that they lack sufficient gravity to pull themselves into a round shape. Scientists think that the elongated shapes of these moons may be a clue to how they formed.

Super-Dense Neutron Star Is Fastest Ever Seen
Astronomers have discovered an ultra-dense star that orbits with a dying stellar companion once every 93 minutes, making it the fastest-orbiting star of its kind.
Image: Credit: NASA/DOE/Fermi LAT Collaboration/AEI
The speedy object, a kind of neutron star called a millisecond pulsar, rockets through space at 8,100 mph (13,000 kph) or more, researchers said. Its lightweight companion — which the “black widow” pulsar is destroying with a barrage of radiation — is faster still, zipping around the system’s common center of mass at 1.7 million mph (2.8 million kph) or so.
The pulsar, known as PSR J1311-3430, and its partner are separated by just 320,000 miles (520,000 kilometers) — about 1.4 times the distance from Earth to the moon — making them the most tightly bound such pair known.
Scientists spotted PSR J1311-3430 after combing through four years’ worth of data collected by NASA’s Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope. The find marks the first time a millisecond pulsar (MSP) has been detected via high-energy gamma rays alone, researchers said.
“The discovery of this first MSP from direct gamma-ray pulsations opens the door to the detection of other extreme binary pulsars,” study lead author Holger Pletsch, of the Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (Albert Einstein Institute) in Hanover, Germany, told SPACE.com via email.
A message from shellshoc
No not stupid at all, great question actually.
There is no specific point where Earth’s gravitational force begins, because it has many different points, not just one. The Earth is not actually smooth, thus some areas will have more mass on its side and thus cause greater gravitational pull. So a mountain’s area would pull more than a flat field.
This is demonstrated in NASA’s GRACE mission, which aimed to measure the gravity of Earth. In it, it showed that our planet’s gravitational forces when demonstrated through a calculated animation looks rather lumpy instead of our conventional thought of it being smooth which we now know for sure that it’s not.
The differences showed a clear assertion that the Earth’s gravity deviates and it looks lumpy, not smooth or unison in all direction. If it were the latter then I could have given you a term/ explanation for that specific point.

Gravity Waves Give Twin Stars Speed Boost, Scientists Say
Two stars circling each other are speeding up in a tell-tale way that scientists attribute to gravitational waves: ripples in the very fabric of space and time.
Image: This illustration shows the gravitational waves thought to be produced by two orbiting white dwarf stars in a binary system called J0651, according to an August 2012 study. Credit: NASA
The stars are dense objects called white dwarfs, which are so close together they take less than 13 minutes to orbit each other. The two white dwarfs, remnants of stars that used to be as big as our sun, are only spread apart by one-third of the distance between the Earth and the moon.
In observing this system, astronomers have made the first measurements in optical light of motions that must be caused by gravitational waves, they said.
“This result marks one of the cleanest and strongest detections of the effect of gravitational waves,” astronomer Warren Brown of the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory said in a statement.
In case you believe in astrology
There have been some silly arguments for astrology from readers of the Tumblr blogs Scipsy and CWL. They were similar to an argument that I heard recently at a dinner party*, so I thought I would add a couple of facts into the discussion, so astrologists can ignore them.
ON THE GRAVITATIONAL EFFECTS OF THE PLANETS, FROM NASA’S WEBSITE:
Here is a table of tidal forces of the Sun, Moon, and Planets. With the Sun’s tidal force equal to 1.00, the following values are given in Thompson (1981):
Moon: 2.21
Sun: 1.00
Venus: 0.000113
Jupiter: 0.0000131
Mars: 0.0000023
Mercury: 0.0000007
Saturn: 0.0000005
Uranus: 0.000000001
Neptune: 0.000000002
Pluto: 0.0000000000001ON THE MAGNETIC EFFECTS OF THE PLANETS, FROM WIKIPEDIA
Others have proposed conventional causal agents such as electro-magnetism within an intricate web of planetary fields and resonances in the solar system. Scientists dismiss magnetism as an implausible explanation, since the magnetic field of a large but distant planet such as Jupiter is far smaller than that produced by ordinary household appliances.
Maybe we should have horoscope signs based on the brands of microwave or toaster ovens in our homes.
*I had to leave the room before my head exploded.
I am SO glad I found this post browsing the #Science tag. Thank you for taking the time out to further elaborate my statement of how realistic influences works. I think I’d be more prone to believe in the influence household appliances holds on my life than what planets or stars have. This is the perfect example of people believing what they want or what is reassuring rather than what is real, so thanks for some good old facts to go along with it.
You can’t just say that “Oh well this has influence on the trajectory of my destiny but let me just forget the fact that there are things surrounding me which would exert even more influence had this been true.”

LRG 3-757: Galactic Horseshoe
A gravitationally lensed galaxy
An interesting galaxy has been circled in this NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope image. The galaxy — one of a group of galaxies called Luminous Red Galaxies — has an unusually large mass, containing about ten times the mass of the Milky Way. However, it’s actually the blue horseshoe shape that circumscribes the red galaxy that is the real prize in this image.
This blue horseshoe is a distant galaxy that has been magnified and warped into a nearly complete ring by the strong gravitational pull of the massive foreground Luminous Red Galaxy. To see such a so-called Einstein Ring required the fortunate alignment of the foreground and background galaxies, making this object’s nickname “the Cosmic Horseshoe” particularly apt.
Credit: NASA/ESA/Hubble

Gravity WavesCredit: Henze/NASAGravity waves are distortions in the fabric of space-time predicted by Albert Einstein’s theory of general relativity. The gravitational waves travel at the speed of light, but they are so weak that scientists expect to detect only those created during colossal cosmic events, such as black hole mergers like the one shown above. LIGO and LISA are two detectors designed to spot the elusive waves.
What is Gravity?
I can think of no better way to answer this question than fire and a trebuchet. Thank you, BBC.
(by BBC)
![matthen:
Why is it always better to look for shooting stars just before dawn? This shows a simulation of the Earth going on its orbit around the Sun, and encountering the debris from a comet that has passed by. This is precisely what the Earth has been doing for the past couple of days, creating the Perseid meteor shower. The A.M. half of the Earth is at the front of the orbit, and like a car’s front wind shield it picks up a lot of the debris. Have a look out for meteors again tonight! [code] [more]](http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lpxnpqSXMC1qfg7o3o1_400.gif)
Why is it always better to look for shooting stars just before dawn? This shows a simulation of the Earth going on its orbit around the Sun, and encountering the debris from a comet that has passed by. This is precisely what the Earth has been doing for the past couple of days, creating the Perseid meteor shower. The A.M. half of the Earth is at the front of the orbit, and like a car’s front wind shield it picks up a lot of the debris. Have a look out for meteors again tonight! [code] [more]
Cats & Others in Zero G (Gravity) for Science
Cats only land on their feet when they know which way is down. Researchers at the Air Force Aerospace Medical Research Laboratories in Dayton, Ohio sent cats flying in a C-131 jet on a trajectory that gave them 15 seconds of weightlessness. This footage is from an Air Force film called Bioastronautics Research.
View More Animals under Zero G via Wired
Video: U.S. Air Force Aerospace Medical Research Laboratorie
A message from nolifechameleon
Yeah it definitely plays a huge role in how stars are formed, how planets are made, how galaxies are constructed. Because at the very heart of these cosmic objects lies a point of mass that attracts all lighter objects within its area of attraction, and its this force that creates orbits along with the fabric of space/time. Gravity however is really weak compared to the other forces, look at it this way.. A small little magnet the size of your thumb can win out the force of gravity when it pulls on a piece of metal gravity already had a hold of. The thing gravity has going for itself that makes it so important is its persistence and how much of it appears throughout our universe.
A message from nolifechameleon
Haha, well somewhat. Gravity is just a prevalent force in this Universe. I’m sure in some other Universe there’s less of it. This force like many others, has its own attraction towards lighter in mass objects, like a magnet except instead of going by electric charges it goes by mass. The amount of mass something has determines the power of gravity/ the pulling force/ the attraction it will likely have towards another object and vice versa. When it comes to gravity, it’s all about DAT MASS

A message from Anonymous
Simple answer: No gravity = Nothing to pull it down on. Space is one huge fabric, and the bigger the mass of an object the more pull power it has on other smaller objects near it.
Detailed: Because of the lack of gravity out there in space, there’s nothing binding celestial bodies to anything but their stars or the largest gravitationally dominant source.
For instance, our solar system doesn’t fall anywhere because our star the sun’s gravitational pull keeps them orbiting around and around like a basketball thrown onto a sheet and then you have little tiny marbles surrounding it (the sheet being the space-time fabric) and the sun and many other stars are gravitationally bound to their galaxy’s black holes. The galaxies wander through space until the black hole has completely reconstructed all the information it devoured and make new matter from it OR when galaxies dance and collide to form a massive super cluster.
Similar to our own Milky Way’s fate with the Andromeda galaxy when they clash and combine to form a super cluster, within millions of years from now Earth will be able to see Andromeda much closer due to both of the core black holes coming closer to one another in time. Great question!

949